On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 22:40 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > you do "noexec" and then complain that executing (!!) windows binaries
> > from that gets more of a problem!
> It only became slower and more memory-consuming -
> is this really what you wanted to achieve?
> Also, you haven't commented on the other points,
> namely, the problem of getting a shm with an exec
then don't put noexec on /dev/shm.
> permission, and the current limitation of an ld.so
> fix (and the solution to it).
ld.so fix is phony. Really; I can always put an "unfixed" ld.so there
and use it as user.
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
