Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps

Hello.

Arjan van de Ven wrote:

you do "noexec" and then complain that executing (!!) windows binaries
from that gets more of a problem!

It only became slower and more memory-consuming -
is this really what you wanted to achieve?
Also, you haven't commented on the other points,
namely, the problem of getting a shm with an exec
permission, and the current limitation of an ld.so
fix (and the solution to it).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
  - From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] list module taint flags in Oops/panic
Next by Date: Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
Next by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]