On 06/10/06, Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru> wrote:
Hi Andrew. The attached patch makes the access(X_OK) to take the "noexec" mount option into an account.
Makes sense to me. -- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru>
- [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()
- From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] VM: Fix the gfp_mask in invalidate_complete_page2
- Next by Date: RE: [discuss] Re: Please pull x86-64 bug fixes
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Index(es):
 |