On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:43:42AM -0700, Suzuki K P wrote:
> Erik Mouw wrote:
> >I think it's best not to change the current behaviour and let all
> >partition checkers run, even if one of them failed due to device
> >errors. I wouldn't mind if the behaviour changed like you propose,
> >though.
> >
> At present, the partition checkers doesn't run, if one of the preceeding
> checker has reported an error ! *But*, some of the checkers doesn't
> report the I/O error which they came across! So, this may let others
> run. Thats not we want, right. We would like them to return I/O errors,
> and and the check_partition should let other partition checkers continue.
Indeed, we want them to behave the same. I.e.: a partition checker
should tell when it encounters an I/O error.
Erik
--
+-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.nl -- +31 70 370 12 90 --
| Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
