On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 09:33:23AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 19:21 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > (And based on the other messages in this thread, it might be useful to
> > include the userspace program's idea of the version in those new
> > commands to allow multiple interface versions to be supported by the
> > kernel).
>
>
> or... don't use a NUMBER for this.
>
> If you have a bitmap for supported features, it's much more powerful!
> That way you can even do this per driver/hardware, and you can
> add/retract individual capabilities rather than lumping everything into
> one big number.
Arjan (as usual) makes a very good suggestion here...
--
John W. Linville
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
- Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
- Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
- Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
- Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
- Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
- Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
- Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
- Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
- Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]