John W. Linville wrote:
The more we can clean-up the WE API, the easier it will be to implement
the cfg80211 WE compatibility layer intended for wireless-dev.
I think WE-21 makes things better in that respect.
Finally, I already scaled-back Jean's original WE-21 patch. I only
anticipate minor bug fixes for WE from now on, with nl80211/cfg80211
as the heir-apparent.
With all that said, I'd prefer to keep the existing WE-21 patches and
add Jean's fixes ASAP. Is this acceptable? If not, I'll submit the
reversions to Jeff ASAP.
I for one don't want to change the userspace ABI for this... If I had
realized the userspace ABI was changing (<- my fault), I wouldn't have
merged the changes in the first place.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
