On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 01:32:05PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > How about adding kerneldoc for sector_t itself? > > Good idea, but afaik it would have to be added for the entire > struct, not just one field. sector_t 's a simple typedef from unsigned long or u64 depending on config rather than a struct - will kerneldoc still pick up the comments on theese? Assuming it will I suggest the following. I've kept my shorter text in the bi_sector field as it is now more fully explained with sector_t. Signed-Off-By: Roger Gammans <[email protected]> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h index 76bdaea..77a8e6b 100644 --- a/include/linux/bio.h +++ b/include/linux/bio.h @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ typedef void (bio_destructor_t) (struct * stacking drivers) */ struct bio { - sector_t bi_sector; + sector_t bi_sector; /* device address in 512 byte + sectors */ struct bio *bi_next; /* request queue link */ struct block_device *bi_bdev; unsigned long bi_flags; /* status, command, etc */ diff --git a/include/linux/types.h b/include/linux/types.h index 3f23566..0ddfa1a 100644 --- a/include/linux/types.h +++ b/include/linux/types.h @@ -127,8 +127,12 @@ #endif /* this is a special 64bit data type that is 8-byte aligned */ #define aligned_u64 unsigned long long __attribute__((aligned(8))) -/* +/** * The type used for indexing onto a disc or disc partition. + * + * Linux always considers sectors to be 512 bytes long independently + * of the devices real block size. + * * If required, asm/types.h can override it and define * HAVE_SECTOR_T */ -- Roger. Home| http://www.sandman.uklinux.net/ Master of Peng Shui. (Ancient oriental art of Penguin Arranging) Work|Independent Sys Consultant | http://www.computer-surgery.co.uk/ So what are the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of 'The Matrix'? --anon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- References:
- fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Roger Gammans <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: [email protected]
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Roger Gammans <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Roger Gammans <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- Prev by Date: RE: Postal 56% waits for flock_lock_file_wait
- Next by Date: Re: Question on HDLC and raw access to T1/E1 serial streams.
- Previous by thread: Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- Next by thread: Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- Index(es):