On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:22:34 -0700 Zach Brown wrote: > > > sector_t bi_sector; /* block layer sector > > * addresses are always in > > * 512-byte units in Linux */ > > How about adding kerneldoc for sector_t itself? Good idea, but afaik it would have to be added for the entire struct, not just one field. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Roger Gammans <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- References:
- fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Roger Gammans <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: [email protected]
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Roger Gammans <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Roger Gammans <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- Prev by Date: Re: SATA: "unknown partition table" error, fdisk can't fix, works in 2.6.13
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] list module taint flags in Oops/panic
- Previous by thread: Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- Next by thread: Re: fs/bio.c - Hardcoded sector size ?
- Index(es):