Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
I will declare the pointers around the jmp instruction directly in assembly : I wouldn't want gcc to put some other code there by mistake. I will use the "name" variable, as it is already there.
Probably better not to. If you use the fake extern, gcc won't be tempted to generate any code to satisfy the reference in the asm param line.
J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- Prev by Date: When will the lunacy end? (Was Re: [PATCH] uswsusp: add pmops->{prepare,enter,finish} support (aka "platform mode"))
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- Index(es):
 |