Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17

* Mathieu Desnoyers ([email protected]) wrote:
> 
> Would it be correct if we put dependencies on a label corresponding to the
> previous asm in the read constraints for each asm ?
> 

Better idea : we could put a read/write dependency on a memory location.

Mathieu

OpenPGP public key:              http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint:     8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]