Stas Sergeev wrote: > The one that goes to /dev/shm should allow PROT_EXEC, yet > not allow executing the binaries with execve(). Why on earth would you want this? Previously you already acknowledged that this kind of "protection" can be worked around by using ld.so directly. Even if you try to stop this you can implement this functionality in a scripting language. Either all executable mapping is forbidden or none. No middle ground can exist. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- References:
- [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
- [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.1[78] page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x20
- Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Index(es):
 |