Hello. Alan Cox wrote:
If you want a tmpfs with noexec and a shared memory space with exec why don't you just sort out mounting two different tmpfs instances ?
The one that goes to /dev/shm should allow PROT_EXEC, yet not allow executing the binaries with execve(). How? There may be other tmpfs instances, I think they are unaffected, but what to do with the /dev/shm one? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- References:
- [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Prev by Date: Re: usb still sucks battery in -rc7-mm1
- Next by Date: [BUG 2.6.18] sata_promise unaligned PCI accesses on sparc64
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
- Index(es):
 |