Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps

Hello.

Alan Cox wrote:

Agreed mprotect should also be fixed.

Since "noexec" was already rendered useless - yes.
Before, people could use it and hope the binaries
won't get executed (and if it was possible to execute
them by invoking ld.so directly, then ld.so could have
been fixed). Now the only possibility is to not use the
"noexec" at all.
So does that add to security or substract?..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
    • From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
    • From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] missing includes from infiniband merge
• Next by Date: Re: More thoughts on getting rid of ZONE_DMA
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]