Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)

[Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>]

Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 12:56 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>   
>> The same for the limiting - either do not start new container, or
>> recalculate limits to meet new requirements. You may not take care of
>> guarantees as weel and create an overcommited configuration.
>>
>> And one more thing. We've asked it many times and I ask it again -
>> please, show us the other way for providing guarantee rather than
>> limiting or reserving.
>>     
>
> Why do we want the capability to be snipped at the infrastructure level.
> Let the controller writers decide how they want to provide the
> capability and the users to decide if they want to use the feature at a
> price.
>   

That's what we proposed in the very beginning - to review an infrastructure
with minimal functionality (limiting) and develop new features after the
"core"
is accepted.

I'm glad that we've finaly made a bargain :)

>   
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>> _______________________________________________
>> ckrm-tech mailing list
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
>>     

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/