Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 12:56 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> <snip>
>> The same for the limiting - either do not start new container, or
>> recalculate limits to meet new requirements. You may not take care of
>> guarantees as weel and create an overcommited configuration.
>> And one more thing. We've asked it many times and I ask it again -
>> please, show us the other way for providing guarantee rather than
>> limiting or reserving.
> Why do we want the capability to be snipped at the infrastructure level.
> Let the controller writers decide how they want to provide the
> capability and the users to decide if they want to use the feature at a
> price.

That's what we proposed in the very beginning - to review an infrastructure
with minimal functionality (limiting) and develop new features after the
is accepted.

I'm glad that we've finaly made a bargain :)

>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
>> _______________________________________________
>> ckrm-tech mailing list

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux