Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)

[Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>]

Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > > I have a C program that computes limits to obtain desired guarantees
> > > in a single 'for (i = 0; i < n; n++)' loop for any given set of guarantees.
> > > With all error handling, beautifull output, nice formatting etc it weights
> > > only 60 lines.
>
> Look at http://wiki.openvz.org/Containers/Guarantees_for_resources
> I've described there how a guarantee can be get with limiting in details.
>
> [snip]
>
> > > I do not 'do not like guarantee'. I'm just sure that there are two ways
> > > for providing guarantee (for unreclaimable resorces):
> > > 1. reserving resource for group in advance
> > > 2. limit resource for others
> > > Reserving is worse as it is essentially limiting (you cut off 100Mb from
> > > 1Gb RAM thus limiting the other groups by 900Mb RAM), but this limiting
> > > is too strict - you _have_ to reserve less than RAM size. Limiting in
> > > run-time is more flexible (you may create an overcommited BC if you
> > > want to) and leads to the same result - guarantee.
> > I think this deserves putting on Wiki.
> > It is very good clear point.
>
> This is also on the page I gave link at.


The program (calculate_limits()) listed on the website does not work for
the following case

N=2;
R=100;
g[2] = {30, 30};


The output is -10 and -10 for the limits

For

N=3;
R=100;
g[3] = {30, 30, 10};

I get -70, -70 and -110 as the limits

Am I interpreting the parameters correctly? Or the program is broken?

--

	Balbir Singh,
	Linux Technology Center,
	IBM Software Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/