Pavel Emelianov wrote:
Kirill Korotaev wrote: [snip]I have a C program that computes limits to obtain desired guarantees in a single 'for (i = 0; i < n; n++)' loop for any given set of guarantees. With all error handling, beautifull output, nice formatting etc it weights only 60 lines.Look at http://wiki.openvz.org/Containers/Guarantees_for_resources I've described there how a guarantee can be get with limiting in details. [snip]I do not 'do not like guarantee'. I'm just sure that there are two ways for providing guarantee (for unreclaimable resorces): 1. reserving resource for group in advance 2. limit resource for others Reserving is worse as it is essentially limiting (you cut off 100Mb from 1Gb RAM thus limiting the other groups by 900Mb RAM), but this limiting is too strict - you _have_ to reserve less than RAM size. Limiting in run-time is more flexible (you may create an overcommited BC if you want to) and leads to the same result - guarantee.I think this deserves putting on Wiki. It is very good clear point.This is also on the page I gave link at.
This approach has the following disadvantages 1. Lets consider initialization - When we create 'n' groups initially, we need to spend O(n^2) time to assign guarantees. 2. Every time a limit or a guarantee changes, we need to recalculate guarantees and ensure that the change will not break any guarantees 3. The same thing as stated above, when a resource group is created or deleted This can lead to some instability; a change in one group propagates to all other groups. -- Balbir Singh, Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- References:
- [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 05/16] GFS2: File and inode operations
- Next by Date: Re: TCP stack behaviour question
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- Index(es):