Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 21:10 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > 
> > this is being worked on actively: there's the "djprobes" patchset, which 
> > includes a simplified disassembler to analyze common target code and can 
> > thus insert much faster, call-a-trampoline-function based tracepoints 
> > that are just as fast as (or faster than) compile-time, static 
> > tracepoints.
> 
> Who is going to implement this for every arch?
> Is this now the official party line that only archs, which implement all 
> of this, can make use of efficient tracing?

In the reverse you are enforcing an ugly - but available for all archs -
solution due to the fact that there is nobody interested enough to
implement it ?

If there is no interest to do that, then this arch can probably live w/o
instrumentation for the next decade too.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Tim Bird <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: [email protected] (Frank Ch. Eigler)
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] [v2] dmaengine: clean up and abstract function types (was Re: [PATCH 08/19] dmaengine: enable multiple clients and operations)
• Next by Date: Re: [NFS] 2.6.18-rc5 page_to_pfn: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]