Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Roman Zippel <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > this is being worked on actively: there's the "djprobes" patchset, 
> > which includes a simplified disassembler to analyze common target 
> > code and can thus insert much faster, call-a-trampoline-function 
> > based tracepoints that are just as fast as (or faster than) 
> > compile-time, static tracepoints.
> 
> Who is going to implement this for every arch?

someone who is interested enough in that arch growing that capability?

> Is this now the official party line that only archs, which implement 
> all of this, can make use of efficient tracing?

that's certainly my preference - kprobes have lots of other advantages 
besides tracing. Whether that becomes the "official party line" depends 
on the technological analysis of the situation which will ultimately 
shape the outcome of this discussion.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux