Ar Gwe, 2006-09-15 am 14:39 +0200, ysgrifennodd Roman Zippel: > Both points have very strong consequences regarding complexity. Why do you > want to deny me the choice to use something simple, especially since both > solutions are not mutually exclusive and can even complement each other? I don't want to deny you the choice, I just don't want to see unneccessary garbage in the base kernel. What you put in your own toilet is a private matter. What you leave out in a public place is different. > What's the point in forcing everyone to use a single solution? Maintainability ? common good over individual weirdnesses ? Ability for people to concentrate on getting one good set of interfaces not twelve bad ones ? Consistency for user space ? Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: "Jose R. Santos" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- References:
- [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Tim Bird <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Synaptics - fix lockdep warnings
- Next by Date: Re: __STRICT_ANSI__ checks in headers
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Index(es):