On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:57:29 -0400 Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]> wrote: > But I submit to you that both explanations > actually highlight the argument I was making earlier with regards to > dynamic tracing (and gdb info in this case) actually require a non- > expert to chase kernel versions and create appropriate appropriate > scripts/config-info for the post-insertion of instrumentation > ... Again, I don't see this as a huge problem. patch(1) is able to keep track of specific places within source code even in the presence of quite violent changes to that source code. There's no reason why systemtap support code cannot do the same. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- References:
- [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Tim Bird <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Prev by Date: Re: Same MCE on 4 working machines (was Re: Early boot hang on recent 2.6 kernels (> 2.6.3), on x86-64 with 16gb of RAM)
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 3/9] Guest page hinting: volatile page cache.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
- Index(es):