Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:11:36PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Yes. I already have it queued for .19 at least. Not sure it's critical enough 
> for .18, especially since it doesn't seem to be a regression.

Yeah, I'd tend to agree.
-- 
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
• Next by Date: Re: Spinlock debugging
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
• Next by thread: problem with OWN bit when writting driver for rtl8139?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]