Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:11:36PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Yes. I already have it queued for .19 at least. Not sure it's critical enough 
> for .18, especially since it doesn't seem to be a regression.

Yeah, I'd tend to agree.
-- 
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
  - From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
  - From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
Next by Date: Re: Spinlock debugging
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
Next by thread: problem with OWN bit when writting driver for rtl8139?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]