Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume

On Tuesday 12 September 2006 14:47, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 11:19:06AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > Got it. i8259A_resume calls init_8259A(0) unconditionally, even if
> > > auto_eoi has been set. Keep track of the current status and restore
> > > that on resume. This fixes it for AMD64 and i386.
> >
> > Patch looks okay to me...
>
> Cool. Andi, does it look sane to you? I'm not really sure who to wave
> 8259 code at...

Yes. I already have it queued for .19 at least. Not sure it's critical enough 
for .18, especially since it doesn't seem to be a regression.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
  - From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>

References:
- io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
  - From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
  - From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: OT: calling kernel syscall manually
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]