On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 11:19:06AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Got it. i8259A_resume calls init_8259A(0) unconditionally, even if > > auto_eoi has been set. Keep track of the current status and restore that > > on resume. This fixes it for AMD64 and i386. > > Patch looks okay to me... Cool. Andi, does it look sane to you? I'm not really sure who to wave 8259 code at... -- Matthew Garrett | [email protected] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- References:
- io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: io-apic - no timer ticks after resume on IXP200
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: io-apic - no timer ticks after resume on IXP200
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: io-apic - no timer ticks after resume on IXP200
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: io-apic - no timer ticks after resume on IXP200
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
- Prev by Date: Re: Suspend to ram with 2.6 kernels
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm2
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] - restore i8259A eoi status on resume
- Index(es):
 |