On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:39:22PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:21:12PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > So why isn't acpi handling all of this for us?
>
> for some people it does...
>
> > Do people not want to use acpi for some reason?
>
> I was told that in the past VIA has buggy/broken ACPI, so we need to
> figure out what ACPI workaround Windows has and implement that (or
> maybe they do it in the driver(s)?)
Then that sounds like an ACPI issue, instead of trying to create a quirk
for the pci device itself.
Why not enable ACPI (which the manufacturer says is the way to go), and
then work from there?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
