On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:21:12PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > So why isn't acpi handling all of this for us? for some people it does... > Do people not want to use acpi for some reason? I was told that in the past VIA has buggy/broken ACPI, so we need to figure out what ACPI workaround Windows has and implement that (or maybe they do it in the driver(s)?) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- References:
- [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ia64 specific for Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- Index(es):