On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:31:12AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > VIA have always told me that "ACPI handles this" and we don't need > quirks. Various chips have different IRQ routing logic and it's all a > bit weird if we don't use ACPI and/or BIOS routing. So why isn't acpi handling all of this for us? Do people not want to use acpi for some reason? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- References:
- [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: Online resources for understanding linux kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- Index(es):
 |