Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:31:12AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
VIA have always told me that "ACPI handles this" and we don't need
quirks. Various chips have different IRQ routing logic and it's all a
bit weird if we don't use ACPI and/or BIOS routing.

So why isn't acpi handling all of this for us?  Do people not want to
use acpi for some reason?

It doesn't appear to be this simple in reality. Chris has reports that indeed enabling ACPI avoids the needs for quirks, but Gentoo have reports that quirks are *only* required in ACPI mode. Sergio is of the opinion that quirks are not required in IO-APIC setups, but Stian has shown that quirks are required on legacy interrupts even with a working IO-APIC setup.

Len Brown has some notes to add:
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2006/07/14/147

Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux