On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 00:55 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Piet Delaney <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 14:15 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> Andi Kleen <[email protected]> writes: > >> > >> > On Wednesday 06 September 2006 18:55, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> >> > >> >> kexec has been marked experimental for a year now and all > >> >> of the serious problems have been worked through. So it > >> >> is time (if not past time) to remove the experimental mark. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Hmm, I personally have some doubts it is really not experimental > >> > (not because of the kexec code itself, but because of all the other drivers > >> > that still break) > >> > >> That is a reasonable viewpoint. Although by that a lot more of the kernel > >> deserves to be marked experimental. > >> > >> On the perverse side of the sentiment taking off experimental may increase > >> our number of testers and get the bugs fixed faster :) > > > > I take it that for using kexec to boot a kdump kernel and then > > rebooting the primary kernel that there are a few drivers in > > the dumping kernel that wouldn't work but they aren't likely > > to be used. Ie: it's "just" a hardware initialization issue > > on kernels booted with kexec. > > Yes. The only place you are likely to observe the driver > initialization problems are kernels booted with kexec. But there > are other rare scenarios that can yield challenging boot driver > initialization scenarios. I know soft booting from windows used > to be one of them. > > As for the kdump kernel usually you won't load (or build in) any > drivers you don't intend to use. If the drivers actually get loaded > even if you aren't using them you could have problems. Thanks for the tip, I'll make sure my dumping kernel only has drivers necessary to make the kernel core file configured. -piet > > Eric -- Piet Delaney Phone: (408) 200-5256 Blue Lane Technologies Fax: (408) 200-5299 10450 Bubb Rd. Cupertino, Ca. 95014 Email: [email protected]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- From: Piet Delaney <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- Prev by Date: Re: patch [0/2]: acpi: add generic removable drive bay support
- Next by Date: Re: [Problem] System hang when I run pounder and syscall test on kernel 2.6.18-rc5
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- Index(es):