On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 21:22 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wednesday 06 September 2006 18:55, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > > kexec has been marked experimental for a year now and all > > of the serious problems have been worked through. So it > > is time (if not past time) to remove the experimental mark. > > > > Hmm, I personally have some doubts it is really not experimental > (not because of the kexec code itself, but because of all the other drivers > that still break) What drivers does kexec break? -piet > > But applied for now. > > -Andi > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Piet Delaney Phone: (408) 200-5256 Blue Lane Technologies Fax: (408) 200-5299 10450 Bubb Rd. Cupertino, Ca. 95014 Email: [email protected]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- References:
- [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 kexec: Remove experimental mark of kexec
- Index(es):
 |