Andi Kleen <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wednesday 06 September 2006 18:55, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> kexec has been marked experimental for a year now and all
>> of the serious problems have been worked through. So it
>> is time (if not past time) to remove the experimental mark.
>>
>
> Hmm, I personally have some doubts it is really not experimental
> (not because of the kexec code itself, but because of all the other drivers
> that still break)
That is a reasonable viewpoint. Although by that a lot more of the kernel
deserves to be marked experimental.
On the perverse side of the sentiment taking off experimental may increase
our number of testers and get the bugs fixed faster :)
> But applied for now.
Thanks.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
