On Tue, Aug 29, David Lang wrote: > you are assuming that > > 1. modules are enabled and ipw2200 is compiled as a module No, why? > 2. initrd or initramfs are in use initramfs is always in use. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
- References:
- [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
- From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
- Index(es):
 |