Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:42:56PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> 
> besides, several kernel versions ago this used to work. the current 
> requirement is a regression as far as the user is concerned.

Then go bug the driver authors please :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
  - From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
  - From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
  - From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
  - From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
  - From: David Lang <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 5/6] Convert to use mutexes instead of semaphores
Next by Date: PROBLEM: HT1000 drops network packets during disk writes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]