Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:46:45AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> >I think the current way we handle firmware works quite well, especially
> >given the wide range of different devices that it works for (everything
> >from BIOS upgrades to different wireless driver stages).
> 
> the current system works for many people yes, but not everyone.
> 
> I'm still waiting to find a way to get the iw2200 working without having to 
> use modules.

Sounds like a bug you need to pester the iw2200 developers about then.
I don't think it has much to do with the firmware subsystem though :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux