Re: [PATCH 0/7] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__

Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok, next try. This time a full series that tries to kill
> off __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__, _syscallX() and the global errno
> for good.

Have you checked uClibc?  Does that use _syscallX()?

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
  - From: "Haavard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Problem with md: Not rebuilding rai5
Next by Date: Re: How to determine whether a file was opened O_DIRECT?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]