Re: [PATCH 4/7] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML

On Wednesday 30 August 2006 07:41, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> syscall() is a horrible botch; it is in fact unimplementable (without 
> enormous switch statements) on a number of architectures.
> 
Ok, good point. I'll leave the _syscallX() macros in for now and only
remove the kernel syscalls in my next submission, so we get at least
the non-controversial part done.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/7] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 4/7] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 4/7] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot
• Next by Date: [S390] dasd: fix device shutdown process.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]