On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 04:20:51PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 06:37:22PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > > I'll come up with a patch tomorrow to try and get a clean stack trace. I've > > made some change to the bug dump output to make it more preemption aware, > > but, as you can, some tweeking is needed. > > I turned off the tracing in the latency tracking stuff and a relatively > small patch is here against -rt8: At __WARN_ON()... I meant. bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Prev by Date: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] IP1000A: IC Plus update 2006-08-22
- Previous by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Next by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Index(es):
 |