Re: [PATCH for review] [127/145] i386: move kernel_thread_helper into entry.S

On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:36:44 +0200
"Jan Beulich" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just like done in the x86-64 patch that I just sent, I'd recommend
> moving
> the push added yesterday outside of the CFI-covered region (so that
> in the unlikely event of being caught at the push there won't be an
> ill
> assumption that a [fake] return address is already on the stack, or
> that
> there is a return address at all):

Done.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH for review] [127/145] i386: move kernel_thread_helper into entry.S
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] i386: fix one case of stuck dwarf2 unwinder II
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH for review] [127/145] i386: move kernel_thread_helper into entry.S
• Next by thread: sysfs vs. d80211 configuration
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]