Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8

On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:44:23PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:56:39AM -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote:
> > And yeah, it is a RAID config.  But for extra bonus points, I found a
> > spare SCSI disk and installed Fedora Core 5 and did a 'yum upgrade' to
> > whatever was current as of today.  So it's a single disk config now.
> > Problem still occurs with 't2' patched kernel.
> > 
> > config and dmesg attached, kaboom-like stuff appended.
> 
> It looks like a screw interaction between the latency tracer and the mutex
> code that creates such a wacked out looking stack trace. Unfortunately,
> I've been unsuccessful at reproducing it, so I'm going to focus on a partial
> clean up so that the rtmutex is a bit more friendly to the latency tracer.
> 
> This is kind of a pain.

I'm high, the latency tracer is fine. I'm going to look at the mutex code more.

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Esben Nielsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ISDN: fix double free bug in isdn_net
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH for review] [127/145] i386: move kernel_thread_helper into entry.S
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]