On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:33:59 +0200
"Jan Beulich" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> So it would seem to me. Nevertheless, in my opinion the proper fix is
> to annotate the call site
> >> (in head.S) to specify a zero EIP as return address (which denotes
> the bottom of a frame).
> >
> >Can you please send a patch to do that?
> >
> >That seems to be missing in some other places too, e.g. i386 sysenter
> path, x86-64 kernel_thread,
> >more?
>
> Attaching both an i386 version (boot/idle thread only, you did
> kernel_thread already)
> and an x86-64 one (boot/idle and kernel_thread). The i386 sysenter path
> is a different
> thing,
Ok added thanks.
Re One open question: Should this added push perhaps be made conditional
upon CONFIG_STACK_UNWIND or CONFIG_UNWIND_INFO?
I don't think that's needed because they are all slow paths.
there we have an actual caller (though outside of the kernel),
> which I'd like to
> continue to reflect/catch through arch_unw_user_mode().
Ok, but does it work now? I thought it didn't.
I've also seen a stuck on the x86-64 sysenter path on x86-64.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
