Re: [PATCH 04/12] hdaps: Correct readout and remove nonsensical attributes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:35:23PM +0300, Shem Multinymous wrote:
> Hi Muli,
> 
> On 8/8/06, Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >   ret = thinkpad_ec_lock();
> >> > >   if (ret)
> >> > >           return ret;
> 
> >Ugh, I missed that - it's called _lock(), but it's actually
> >down_interruptible().
> 
> Why is that confusing?

lock() sounds like spin_lock() to me, and spin_lock() can't
fail. Idiomatic code is easier for my brain to parse.

> >Why not just get rid of the wrapper and call
> >down_interruptible() directly? That makes it obvious what's going on.
> 
> We may end up needing to lock away other subsystems (ACPI?) that
> touch the same ports. Apparently not an issue right now, but could
> change with new firmware. (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/7/147)

When (if) it becomes necessary to lock away other subsystems, the
wrapper can be easily reintroduced.

Cheers,
Muli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux