Re: [PATCH 04/12] hdaps: Correct readout and remove nonsensical attributes

[Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>]

On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:35:23PM +0300, Shem Multinymous wrote:
> Hi Muli,
> 
> On 8/8/06, Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> > >   ret = thinkpad_ec_lock();
> >> > >   if (ret)
> >> > >           return ret;
> 
> >Ugh, I missed that - it's called _lock(), but it's actually
> >down_interruptible().
> 
> Why is that confusing?

lock() sounds like spin_lock() to me, and spin_lock() can't
fail. Idiomatic code is easier for my brain to parse.

> >Why not just get rid of the wrapper and call
> >down_interruptible() directly? That makes it obvious what's going on.
> 
> We may end up needing to lock away other subsystems (ACPI?) that
> touch the same ports. Apparently not an issue right now, but could
> change with new firmware. (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/7/147)

When (if) it becomes necessary to lock away other subsystems, the
wrapper can be easily reintroduced.

Cheers,
Muli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/