On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 08:28 -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 09:22 -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> >
> >> Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> >>
> >>> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> My personal opinion on existing AIO is that it is not the right design.
> >>>>> Benjamin LaHaise agree with me (if I understood him right),
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> I completely agree with that aswell.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> I agree, too, but the current code is not the last of the line. Suparna
> >>> has a st of patches which make the current kernel aio code work much
> >>> better and especially make it really usable to implement POSIX AIO.
> >>>
> >>> In Ottawa we were talking about submitting it and Suparna will. We just
> >>> thought about a little longer timeframe. I guess it could be
> >>> accelerated since he mostly has the patch done. But I don't know her
> >>> schedule.
> >>>
> >>> Important here is, don't base any decision on the current aio
> >>> implementation.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Ulrich,
> >>
> >> Suparna mentioned your interest in making POSIX glibc aio work with
> >> kernel-aio at OLS.
> >> We thought taking a re-look at the (kernel side) work BULL did, would be
> >> a nice starting
> >> point. I re-based those patches to 2.6.18-rc2 and sent it to Zach Brown
> >> for review before
> >> sending them out to list.
> >>
> >> These patches does NOT make AIO any cleaner. All they do is add
> >> functionality to support
> >> POSIX AIO easier. These are
> >>
> >> [ PATCH 1/3 ] Adding signal notification for event completion
> >>
> >> [ PATCH 2/3 ] lio (listio) completion semantics
> >>
> >> [ PATCH 3/3 ] cancel_fd support
> >>
> >
> > Badari,
> >
> > Thanks for refreshing those patches, they have been sitting here
> > for quite some time now and collected dust.
> >
> > I also think Suparna's patchset for doing buffered AIO would be
> > a real plus here.
> >
> >
> >> Suparna explained these in the following article:
> >>
> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/148755/
> >>
> >> If you think, this is a reasonable direction/approach for the kernel and
> >> you would take care
> >> of glibc side of things - I can spend time on these patches, getting
> >> them to reasonable shape
> >> and push for inclusion.
> >>
> >
> > Ulrich, I you want to have a look at how those patches are put to
> > use in libposix-aio, have a look at http://sourceforge.net/projects/paiol.
> >
> > It could be a starting point for glibc.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sébastien.
> >
> >
> Sebastien,
>
> Suparna mentioned at Ulrich wants us to concentrate on kernel-side
> support, so that he
> can look at glibc side of things (along with other work he is already
> doing). So, if we
> can get an agreement on what kind of kernel support is needed - we can
> focus our
> efforts on kernel side first and leave glibc enablement to capable hands
> of Uli :)
>
That's fine with me.
Sébastien.
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Sébastien Dugué BULL/FREC:B1-247
phone: (+33) 476 29 77 70 Bullcom: 229-7770
mailto:[email protected]
Linux POSIX AIO: http://www.bullopensource.org/posix
http://sourceforge.net/projects/paiol
-----------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
