Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> My personal opinion on existing AIO is that it is not the right design. >> Benjamin LaHaise agree with me (if I understood him right), > > I completely agree with that aswell. I agree, too, but the current code is not the last of the line. Suparna has a st of patches which make the current kernel aio code work much better and especially make it really usable to implement POSIX AIO. In Ottawa we were talking about submitting it and Suparna will. We just thought about a little longer timeframe. I guess it could be accelerated since he mostly has the patch done. But I don't know her schedule. Important here is, don't base any decision on the current aio implementation. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.
- References:
- [2/4] kevent: network AIO, socket notifications.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- [2/4] kevent: network AIO, socket notifications.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add SATA device to VIA IRQ quirk fixup list
- Next by Date: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Previous by thread: Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.
- Next by thread: Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.
- Index(es):
 |