Adrian Bunk wrote: >[1] the conclusion itself might or might not be true > e.g. there _could_ be an 1:5 ratio between reiser4 and ext3 users > but your data is not in any way able to support or reject this > statement > > It does however suggest that my surprise at how people at the last Linux Conference I went to all seemed to know that there exists a Reiser4 may be due to it being more widely used than I would have guessed. Maybe there is some coolness factor to having the faster FS that you can't get from any Distro that is enough to overcome the hassle of compiling reiser4progs and a kernel before inserting the DVD. I would not have guessed we had 1/5th of ext3's usage even among lkml readers..... I guess the market contains more people who like technology than I was guessing. Maybe there is a positive word of mouth effect going on too. It would be nice if SuSE and others at least made it an unsupported option at install time. I shall have to find the time to go asking them all..... Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: "Horst H. von Brand" <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- References:
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- Next by Date: [PATCH] Fix trivial unwind info bug
- Previous by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Index(es):