On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:43:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > My distribution example was just one example of what happens when you > wrongly try to estimate a marked share based on klive data (and it seems You're again wrong generalizing. With KLive I can attempt to estimate market share of _kernel_ code (what Hans did), but you can't attempt to estimate market share of userland (what you did). It won't be a smile at the end making your statement right. The estimate market share of kernel code may not be accurate but it has some minor significance. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Rene Rebe <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Nikita Danilov <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: [email protected]
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.
- Next by Date: Re: automated test? (was Re: Linux 2.6.17.7)
- Previous by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Index(es):