Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled

On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 09:26 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Ingo, does the following look good to you?
> 
> Do not pull in various includes through lockdep.h if lockdep is disabled.

Hi,

can you tell us what this fixes? Eg is there a specific problem?
I mean... we're adding ifdefs so there better be a real good reason for
them.... fixing something real would be such a reason ;-)

Greetings,
    Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled
  - From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] mthca: initialize send and receive queue locks separately
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled
  - From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: async network I/O, event channels, etc
Next by Date: [patch] lockdep: annotate vfs_rmdir for filesystems that take i_mutex in delete_inode
Previous by thread: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]