Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il>]

Quoting r. Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled
> 
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 09:26 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Ingo, does the following look good to you?
> > 
> > Do not pull in various includes through lockdep.h if lockdep is disabled.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> can you tell us what this fixes? Eg is there a specific problem?

Er ... it's a cosmetic change - there's no serious problem, it is just that even
if I disable lockdep, linux/lockdep.h will pull in several headers even
though they are not needed -> more useless work for compiler to do.

> I mean... we're adding ifdefs

Note this doesn't add ifdefs, just moves them around.

> so there better be a real good reason for
> them.... fixing something real would be such a reason ;-)

Well, I don't expect this specific bit to speed compilation up in any measurable
way, but unnecessary includes do have the tendency to accumulate and lead to
slower builds ...

Is that a reason?

-- 
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/