[PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled

Ingo, does the following look good to you?

Do not pull in various includes through lockdep.h if lockdep is disabled.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 316e0fb..39d50c4 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@
 #ifndef __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H
 #define __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
 #include <linux/stacktrace.h>
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-
 /*
  * Lock-class usage-state bits:
  */
-- 
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] mthca: initialize send and receive queue locks separately
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: BUG: __d_find_alias went POP! (was: BUG: lock held at task exit time!)
Next by Date: Re: async network I/O, event channels, etc
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mthca: initialize send and receive queue locks separately
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]