[PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled

Ingo, does the following look good to you?

Do not pull in various includes through lockdep.h if lockdep is disabled.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 316e0fb..39d50c4 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@
 #ifndef __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H
 #define __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
 #include <linux/stacktrace.h>
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-
 /*
  * Lock-class usage-state bits:
  */
-- 
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] mthca: initialize send and receive queue locks separately
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: BUG: __d_find_alias went POP! (was: BUG: lock held at task exit time!)
• Next by Date: Re: async network I/O, event channels, etc
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mthca: initialize send and receive queue locks separately
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]