On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 05:23:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:10:59 -0400
> Horms <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 12:27:51AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Monday 17 July 2006 18:17, Horms wrote:
> > > ...
> > > Keeping the delay might be actually useful so that you can see the panic
> > > before system reboots when reboot on panic is enabled. I would just use a loop
> > > of mdelays(1) with touch_nmi_watchdog/touch_softirq_watchdog()s
> > > inbetween.
> >
> > Ok, I will look into making that happen. I agree that the pause is
> > quite useful.
>
> It's kind-of already implemented, via pause_on_oops. Perhaps doing
> something like
>
> if (panic_on_oops)
> pause_on_oops = max(pause_on_oops, 5*HZ);
>
> would be sufficient.
Thanks, that may well be sufficient. And I assume that it is nicely out
of the arch-dependant code in die(). I will poke around a bit more.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]