Re: [RFC PATCH 01/33] Add apply_to_page_range() function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Adrian Bunk ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 12:00:01AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> >...
> > --- a/mm/memory.c	Fri Mar 24 04:29:46 2006 +0000
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c	Fri Mar 24 04:30:48 2006 +0000
> > @@ -1358,6 +1358,100 @@ int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struc
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(remap_pfn_range);
> >  
> > +static inline int apply_to_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
> > +				     unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > +				     pte_fn_t fn, void *data)
> >...
> > +static inline int apply_to_pmd_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud,
> > +				     unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > +				     pte_fn_t fn, void *data)
> >...
> > +static inline int apply_to_pud_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
> > +				     unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > +				     pte_fn_t fn, void *data)
> >...
> 
> Please avoid "inline" in C files.
> 
> (gcc already automatically inlines static functions with only one caller.)

Sure, that's fair.  The surrounding similar code follows the same format 
as above, perhaps you plan to patch?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux