On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:22:17PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
>
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:17:20 -0400, Horms wrote:
>
> > This patch is part of an effort to unify the panic_on_oops behaviour
> > across all architectures that implement it.
> >
> > It was pointed out to me by Andi Kleen that if an oops has occured
> > in interrupt context, then calling sleep() in the oops path will only cause
> > a panic, and that it would be really better for it not to be in the path at
> > all.
>
> i386 already checks in_interrupt() and panics immediately:
Very good point. I guess that needs to be moved to after
panic_on_oops() if the change that Andi suggests works out.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
